🇺🇸 United States · English ← Edition home
News

Sophie Rain’s Alleged Stalker Goes Missing After ‘Blood Oath’ Claim

For readers in the United States

Author: Shivam Das · Independent coverage. Corrections / Contact

Sophie Rain and Connor Litka in a TMZ report about the alleged Florida home break-in
Sophie Rain and Connor Litka in a TMZ report about the alleged Florida home break-in

Sophie Rain says she is frightened after an accused stalker allegedly told crisis-center staff that he and the creator had taken a “blood oath” and that he wanted to return to Florida to be with her.

Sophie Rain and Connor Litka in a TMZ report about the alleged Florida home break-in

TMZ reported September 9, 2026, that court documents described statements allegedly made by Connor Litka while he was at a crisis center in South Bend, Indiana. Rain has denied ever having a romantic relationship with Litka or taking any blood oath with him. TMZ reported.

What Did the Alleged Stalker Claim?

According to the court documents described by TMZ, a crisis-center staff member reported that Litka said he and Rain were a couple and had taken a “blood oath.” The report also said he wanted to leave Indiana and return to Florida to be with Rain.

The documents do not establish that the alleged relationship or oath existed. Rain directly rejected both claims, saying the situation was deeply frightening for her and her family.

The Earlier Florida Home Incident

The latest claims came after a 2025 Florida incident involving Litka. NBC 6 South Florida reported that police were called to a Fort Lauderdale rental after a man allegedly entered the property. Rain and other creators later described the incident as frightening.

Police eventually arrested Litka after a standoff involving officers and negotiators. NBC 6 reported that he was charged with burglary, resisting an officer without violence and providing false identification. The station later reported that he received 89 days in jail and probation.

What Happened at the Crisis Center?

TMZ reported that Litka had been at a crisis center when he allegedly made the statements about Rain. The court-related material cited in the report also described concerns raised by his mother and a crisis-center employee about his behavior.

Those statements are allegations contained in court-related records. They should not be treated as independent findings that Rain and Litka had a relationship.

Rain’s Response

Rain told TMZ that she had never taken a blood oath with Litka and that any belief that they had a personal relationship was completely untrue. She said her priority was protecting herself and the people around her.

Why the Case Matters for Online Creators

Rain’s case highlights a difficult part of internet fame: a large audience can create a false sense of personal access. For creators, protecting private location information, documenting unwanted contact and taking credible threats seriously can become essential parts of personal security.

Quick Answer

Sophie Rain’s accused stalker, Connor Litka, was reported to have gone missing from a South Bend crisis center after allegedly claiming that he and Rain had taken a “blood oath” and that he wanted to return to Florida to be with her. Rain says those claims are completely untrue. The allegations followed a 2025 Florida home break-in that led to Litka’s arrest and later probation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Connor Litka?

Connor Litka is the man identified in reports and court-related documents connected to the 2025 Florida home incident involving a property associated with Sophie Rain.

What is the “blood oath” claim?

It is a claim attributed to Litka in court-related material described by TMZ. Rain has denied that any such oath or personal relationship existed.

Did Sophie Rain know Connor Litka personally?

Rain says she did not have a personal relationship with him and has rejected the claims described in the documents.

Why is this important for creators?

The case shows how online fame can create serious privacy and physical-security challenges when someone becomes fixated on a public figure.

Sources and Further Reading

Author: Shivam Das

Back to top