Multiple U.S. cities are scaling back or ending contracts with Flock Safety, the company behind a widely deployed network of automated license plate reader cameras, following revelations about data sharing and broader surveillance capabilities.
What to know
Boston officials announced they will no longer use Flock cameras after discovering the company had shared data with external law enforcement agencies despite contractual language and confirmations that sharing was disabled. The city is exploring alternative systems from other vendors.
Similar moves are underway elsewhere. Some departments have deactivated large portions of their camera networks after state funding pauses or community pushback over privacy. Hackers who examined a downed Flock unit reported that the devices can detect more than license plates, including people, bicycles, and certain bumper stickers.
Boston Dropped Flock Safety After Police Checked 1 Data-Sharing Setting https://www.inc.com/kevin-haynes/boston-dropped-flock-safety-after-police-checked-1-data-sharing-setting/91406593
— OnlineFreeUSA (@OnlineFreeUSA) September 17, 2026
Supporters of the technology argue the cameras help solve crimes, locate missing people, and recover stolen vehicles. Critics say the systems enable mass surveillance with insufficient oversight, especially when data can be accessed across jurisdictions.
Local governments continue to weigh public-safety benefits against privacy risks as more cities review their contracts and usage policies.
Based on city reports, police statements, and contemporaneous coverage as of mid-September 2026.
